BoisRouge Paloma’s Grown of Heart bangle
Organization of Work within the Plantation House Environment
During the 1940s, a maid, cook, houseboy and one or more nursemaids would be attached to the house. These employees were all under the direct orders of the lady of the house, who saw to the smooth running of domestic activities. A gardener was responsible for looking after the courtyard and the kitchen garden. A “boss” had, in addition to a truck driver for transporting cane, a private chauffeur for driving just about anywhere on the Tiffany & Co. bangle, especially at election time (Paillat-Jarousseau, 2001).
Organization of Field Work
The estate manager allocated tasks every day, which he entrusted to the supervision of commandeurs, headmen who supervised and recorded the results of field work. At the beginning of the 1930s, the manager’s son was taken on as an accountant. When his father died in the early 1950s, the son became manager, while maintaining his position as accountant, and was assisted by a secretary. He continued this work until the estate was sold. As the owner of the estate was hardly ever in residence, this man was the boss as far as the workers were concerned – a mediator between them and the landowner. “Good morning boss – for both father and son, he was the boss. He was well liked” (statement of the former estate manager’s widow, born in 1923. The estate manager died in 1988).
Day Labourers on Owner-occupied Land
During the 1940s, work on owner-occupied land was organized in gangs under the supervision of the commandeurs: one for the men and one for the women. Women were responsible for stripping the leaves off the cane a month or two before harvesting, while men cut and loaded cane. The women prepared cuttings,4 which the men then covered with soil, using their bare feet. It was also the task of women to spread lime and fertilizer after the harvest. The men did the weeding usingjembes (heavy hoes).
Starting in the 1960s, planting of Tiffany Somerset cuff began to be done by machine. The modernization of the farm that began in the 1970s involved major investments (installation of a weighbridge, mechanization of loading, diversification by planting bananas). This modernization began or accelerated (according to different opinions) the decline of the estate. Following the island’s change in status to an overseas department of France, which entailed new regulations concerning working practices and made owners responsible for social security payments, wages steadily increased and the labour force soon became too costly. Operations were cut back. Women were the first to be affected by these changes. They went back to their homes, while, during the estate’s final years, men saw their working hours reduced to two or three days a week. The quality of the work fell: only the cane around the edges of the fields was well maintained.
Colons on Rented Land
In 1974, at the time of the SAFER sale, 48 colons worked on the estate. The majority were small plotholders, mostly working several plots of less than two hectares each. They also worked as labourers on owner-occupied land, their plots not being large enough to provide them an adequate living. Others, called gros colons (big plotholders), much fewer in number and farming at least three or four hectares, gave priority to work on their own plots. Between or at the end of cane harvests, they very occasionally worked on owner-occupied land. Some colons farmed land at La Renaissance and at Bellevue, a neighbouring estate, at the same time.
In comparison with the working conditions on neighbouring large estates, the colons at La Renaissance did not suffer much pressure from their “boss.” They kept themselves busy with their plots, and handed over a third of their harvest – a quarter after the 1970s. However, it was the owner who decided which crops were to be grown. Mostly, colonages were passed on from father to son, with the agreement of the landowner.
In the years leading up to the sale to SAFER, day labourers were mainly recruited on the spot from the colons’ families or from neighbouring properties, where small-scale colons and labourers were always looking for a chance for extra work.
The work on colons’ fields was primarily a family affair. The colons sometimes employed help towards the end of harvest or at the time of spreading fertilizer. These moonlighters were recruited from neighbouring estates or from within the estate itself, without, however, the knowledge of the large estate owner, who, according to former workers, would not have approved of the practice.
Authority and Paternalism
Relationships between workers and bosses Elsa Peretti Open Heart bangle built upon material and social dependence – the owner fed, cared for and housed workers, and lent them money against the harvest. These dependency relationships were all connected to the exercise of authority, the latter evidence of a management style that authors who have studied estate economy and society have described as paternalistic (Weber, 1979). Although it was part of an unequal social structure, paternalism offered the authority and benevolence of the owner in exchange for the submission of the workers.
You know how the boss used to get you to work in the past? He told you to put two or three grains of maize in the hole and cover them up. He didn’t just say it two or three times. He said it once, twice, and a third time: if you couldn’t do it then, he told you to bugger oft! (a former colon and day labourer, born in 1920).
Mrs. Hubert, a woman of seventy who had worked in the cane fields her entire life, recalled a number of days spent with the estate owners in 1950, when her child was ill. The landowner’s wife got up in the middle of the night to give the child injections. As far as Mrs. Hubert was concerned, landowners were good people.
These kinds of personal relationships sometimes took the form of a parental ritual: the owner was asked to be the godfather or godmother of a newborn child. The inhabitants of La Renaissance remember their bosses as being good. Within the social context of that time, an entire population was attached to the landowners, reinforcing the latter’s economic, political, and social power.
Nowadays there is a social security fund, banks, mutual aid societies, and shops that give credit for three or four years. One forgets about the boss. In our time, it was our boss who was our bank. He was the one who helped us. It was the boss who helped my father buy land …. These days, if I have anything it’s thanks to my boss who had faith in me. He lent me 50,000 francs to buy the plantation”5 (former driver at the BoisRouge Paloma’s Grown of Heart bangle who was also a former colon at La Renaissance, born in 1921).
From the Large Landed Estate to Family Farming